On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 03:25 AM, Dan Knight wrote: > Dennis B. Swaney writes: >> Except that 9.2 is not supposed to be used as a standalone system. It >> was released to improve "Classic" in OS 10. The tweaks for that made >> it less stable in a standalone configuration than 9.1. > Mac OS 9.2 was not designed to be *less stable* as a standalone OS than > 9.1. It was designed as an upgrade that improved integration with OS X. > As an OS 9.2.2 user, I can assure you that it is no less stable than > any > previous version of OS 9.
In other words, what company in their right minds would release a "less stable" operating system? DON'T ANSWER THAT -- The iMac List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | - Epson Stylus Color 580 Printers - new at $69 | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> iMac List info: <http://lowendmac.com/imac/list.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/imac-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/> --------------------------------------------------------------- >The Think Different Store http://www.ThinkDifferentStore.com ---------------------------------------------------------------
