On l�rdag, aug 23, 2003, at 22:10 Europe/Stockholm, Mark Benson wrote:
My PM5500/225Mhz 603e might be better off with HFS then!How big or small a disk for HFS+ be superior over HFS?
Actual drive is 2.1GB.
For use on older Macs I consider 2GB t o be the break point between using HFS and HFS+, and i have tested the hypothesis with 4GB and 9GB drives on a Quadra 840av.
However, on anything powered by a 604e or better I always use HFS+ regardless of the drive's size, the CPU is able to overcome most of the lag imposed by using HFS+, to the extent that it is not noticeable on most 200MHz or faster machines.
Thanks/jas
-- The iMac List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...
Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | - Epson Stylus Color 580 Printers - new at $69 | & CDRWs on Sale! |
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
iMac List info: <http://lowendmac.com/imac/list.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:" Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/imac-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Think Different Store
http://www.ThinkDifferentStore.com ---------------------------------------------------------------
