> On Jan 21, 2026, at 8:26 AM, Gluender <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear experts,
>
> in certain cases there seems to be a discrepancy between the slice/channel
> sequence of a hyperstack and the slice/channel label naming.
Dear Herbie,
Thanks to Michael Schmid, this bug is fixed in the ImageJ 1.54s13 daily build.
-wayne
> Attached please find a stack "stack.tif" consisting of six slices that stand
> for two z-positions and three colours. When opening as *virtual* stack and
> applying "Stack to Hyperstack..." to this stack with setting
>
> Order: xyzct
> Channels 3
> Slices 2
> Frames 1
>
> the result is the attached hyperstack "hyperstack-V.tif".
>
> Corresponding ImageJ-macro:
> path=File.openDialog("choose file \"stack.tif\"") ;
> run("TIFF Virtual Stack...","open="+path);
> run("Stack to Hyperstack...","channels=3 slices=2 frames=1");
> Stack.setDisplayMode("color");
> exit();
>
> The resulting hyperstack shows the *correct sequence* of slices and colours
> but the names of slice/channel *labels are discrepant* (see the attached
> screen-shot "example-view").
>
> The effect does *not* occur, if "Stack to Hyperstack..." is applied to the
> real stack, i.e. not to the virtual stack.
>
> Could someone please confirm and perhaps even remedy this strange behaviour?
>
> Regards
>
> Herbie
>
>
>
> --
> ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html
> <stack.tif>
> <setting.png>
> <hyperstack-V.tif>
> <example-view_hyperstack-V.tiff>
--
ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html
