Thanks Wayne,
I already wrote Michael off-list.
A doctoral student has asked me for help and by doing so I was
confronted with this little discrepancy. I think she will be very happy
when seeing the correct slice names now!
All the very best for you and thanks in general for ImageJ
Herbie
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Am 25.01.26 um 05:14 schrieb Wayne Rasband:
On Jan 21, 2026, at 8:26 AM, Gluender <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear experts,
in certain cases there seems to be a discrepancy between the slice/channel
sequence of a hyperstack and the slice/channel label naming.
Dear Herbie,
Thanks to Michael Schmid, this bug is fixed in the ImageJ 1.54s13 daily build.
-wayne
Attached please find a stack "stack.tif" consisting of six slices that stand for two
z-positions and three colours. When opening as *virtual* stack and applying "Stack to
Hyperstack..." to this stack with setting
Order: xyzct
Channels 3
Slices 2
Frames 1
the result is the attached hyperstack "hyperstack-V.tif".
Corresponding ImageJ-macro:
path=File.openDialog("choose file \"stack.tif\"") ;
run("TIFF Virtual Stack...","open="+path);
run("Stack to Hyperstack...","channels=3 slices=2 frames=1");
Stack.setDisplayMode("color");
exit();
The resulting hyperstack shows the *correct sequence* of slices and colours but the names
of slice/channel *labels are discrepant* (see the attached screen-shot
"example-view").
The effect does *not* occur, if "Stack to Hyperstack..." is applied to the real
stack, i.e. not to the virtual stack.
Could someone please confirm and perhaps even remedy this strange behaviour?
Regards
Herbie
--
ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html
<stack.tif>
<setting.png>
<hyperstack-V.tif>
<example-view_hyperstack-V.tiff>
--
ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html
--
ImageJ mailing list: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/list.html
