>in the email so that they might receive remuneration for the program. The
>question here is, why don't we go after the one who benefits directly from
>the email. I would not bat an eye to bill that person $1.00 per email that
>From what I have read... Court cases have ruled that the company(a) sending
the email is an independant contractor working on behalf of the company(b)
selling the product. That distinction of 'independant contractor' and the
fact that the contractor is NOT using company(b) equipment will prevent you
from collecting anything from company(b).
>$10,000 - $20,000, I think the word would get around quickly that crime
>doesn't pay. Guess what? I have control over their credit cards already.
It wouldn't fly... All they have to do is 'dispute' the charge (they have
up to six months) and money is removed from your mechant account immediately
and you are charged a service fee. *you* must prove it is a valid charge -
remember, you have no signature or card imprint for the specific
transaction.
I think blocking is the best protection right now.
