Jumping in here late and not reading all the posts, but T files are not orphans per se', rather incomplete transmissions. As such, Imail never told the sending server or client that that message was received OK and gracefully ended the session. As such, the sending server or client will retry to send until successful.
John T eServices For You > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imail > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 12:50 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] T and D files piling up > > Oh, ok. > > Then I suggest you move to another email package right away. > > > At 11:09 AM 8/25/2005, you wrote: > > > > > "Yeah, that's great, except that would be killing legit > > > mail, and keep everyone pissed off at me because > > > they're not getting all their mail." > > > > > > Last time I talked to Imail tech I was told that the T > > > files that hang around that long are orphaned anyway > > > and will never become Q files. But then what do I know. > > > >"orphaned" should never be a term used by an email system... The messages > >should go SOMEWHERE. I've never seen any other mail system handle messages > >in such a way as to "orphan" them and just leave them lying around... It's a > >lame way to deal with such messages, but that's really IPSwitch's fault. > >It's yet another reason why we need to get away from iMail. Anyway, as I've > >tried to say, these messages are legit and should not be "hanging around" at > >all. > > > >If I told a tech that these legitimate messages are in the queue, that > >should be deliverable according to the contents of the files I see sitting > >around, I wonder if he'd still slap a blatantly generic, presumptuous label > >of "orphaned" on them. If so, then the whole flippin' system is invalid as > >far as I'm concerned. These messages SHOULD be going somewhere, and I can > >verify their validity, or I too would call them orphaned. I wonder if the T > >files remain, un-renamed to Q files, because the message is only partially > >received or something? > > > > > > > > Why don't you try calling Imail, if you have a > > > maintenance agreement. > > > > > > >The maintenance agreement was a joke... The promise of 'upgrades' was lame, > >and with the latest nonsense about ICS I will never again lock myself into a > >long term relationship with this company. This list was always more helpful > >and knowledgeable than the people I talked to at dIPSwitch, if I could ever > >reach them at all. So no, I don't have a maintenance agreement. > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > >List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > >Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > >--- > >[This E-mail scanned for viruses courtesy of Netslyder, > >Inc.(http://www.netslyder.net)] > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > >No virus found in this incoming message. > >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > >Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.15/81 - Release Date: 8/24/2005 > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.15/81 - Release Date: 8/24/2005 > > > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses courtesy of Netslyder, > Inc.(http://www.netslyder.net)] > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
