On 12/21/05, Matt Lemke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In your implementation of Greylisting do you delay all mail for the 
> recommended 1
> hour before allowing delivery?
> I am looking for a solid solution to these dictionary attacks, but wonder 
> what end users
> think about this type of delay.

No I sure don't.  I use the default of 5 minutes, which is what ASSP
is set for out of the box IIRC.  That delay is plenty to turn away an
enormous amount of spam and short enough that -- so far -- not one
client has commented on it.

Usually a correspondent is only delayed once.  Once a triplet has
retried and been accepted, it is also whitelisted (from greylisting). 
If after making it past the greylist and being whitelisted from that
feature, one of the other filters bags it, the triplet's whitelisting
from the greylist feature is immediately reversed and the triplet is
delayed again the next time mail from it arrives.  And of course an
email from a locally auth'd user whitelists the recipient from all
spam filtering for up to 90 days (the 90-day renewal is renewed
whenever there is email going to or coming from the whitelisted
address).


--
--mattRobertson--
Janitor, MSB Web Systems
mysecretbase.com

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to