How do you do that?
Thanks,
Bill
Darin Cox wrote:
We haven't installed it yet, waiting
for everything to settle down, but I have an idea as to a possible
cause regarding the slowness: .NET's Viewstate could be the culprit.
I've run into this before, as it causes the browser to have to send a
ton of info back to the server, which is usually at much slower upload
rates than the download rates. Turning off the Viewstate where it is
not needed (.NET always turns it on by default) has resulted in a huge
difference for us in the past.
The good thing is this can all be
controlled by the ASPX files, so since no code-behind source code is
needed we can test this on our own. Anyone have it installed that is
comfortable enough with .NET to turn Viewstate off where it isn't
needed in the ASPX files? Admittedly this would be best done by
Ipswitch, but someone familiar enough with .NET should be able to take
a stab at it as well.
Darin.
-----
Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006
I would say if you're users are NOT using web
messaging to go for it. Since the new web messaging was the sole reason
we decided to stay with Imail we are VERY disappointed in its
performance. It's basically a Lexus with a Yugo engine. Looks good but
slow as molasses.
Bill
Brian Hruska wrote:
So what is CURRENT conceusus with the 2006 release? Does
it work well enough to upgrade to yet?
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
|
- Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006 Matrosity Hosting
-
