|
Matt
~
I
agree, Focus on server performance.
_________________
David Penrose
Top Network
LLC
360.392.0467 v
Seattle
206.529.4128 v
206.202.3776 f
-----Original Message----- Dave,From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] email check limits Certainly it's your prerogative to set the policies as you see fit. I would only suggest that instead of focusing on the logging load, that you instead indicate more frequent checking causes more load on your server's resources. I believe that under heavy load and many, many users, the open connections, authentication and checks on the file system can contribute to reducing a server's ability to handle the load. The larger the number of users that you have, the more it makes sense to set a policy. A few users doing this shouldn't make much of a difference in any environment. If you are looking for something that bothers the heck out of me, bring up all of the clients with automated mailing scripts and bulk-mail lists that have excessive numbers of bad addresses. I regularly get bombed by this sort of thing, and it's never purposeful, though always the result of an oversight. It takes a ton of resources to spam check and then scan with two virus scanners 1,000 E-mails delivered as fast as my server will accept them. I have one customer that insists on sending themselves a copy of each of 350 E-mails that are sent to their clients on a nightly basis, yet it is impossible for them to do anything constructive with this daily volume of E-mail landing in an account. Matt David Penrose wrote:
|
Title: Message
- RE: [IMail Forum] email check limits David Penrose
- RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] email check limits GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
- Re: [IMail Forum] email check limits Nick Hayer
