There's a great book I just finished, albeit somewhat one-sided in its
viewpoint, called, "The Rape of Ma Bell".  It tells the real story about how
the Justice Department started the breakup of the original AT&T back in the
early 50s, under the Eisenhower Administration and they successfully fought
it - and held back on both lower prices and progress (ie: they successfully
stood in the way of any new products and services that might be introduced
by their competition) until 1982 when Judge Green forced the actual split of
the company.  

Once that happened, they had the opportunity to keep pace with their new
competitors, but, instead, chose to micro-manage the actual split of the
original Bell System into smaller companies, each of which had just enough
knowledge to stay in business but not quite enough knowledge to stay ahead
of the competition.  The only thing that saved the Baby Bells was all of the
installed infrastructure and the actual "last mile".  Once they were forced
to start sharing that for internet connectivity to the home, Whitaker (head
of the former SBC and former President of Ameritech, ie: Illinois Bell)
decided he wanted to start putting Humpty Dumpty back together again.
Almost everything he's done to accomplish what he's managed so far has
either been illegal or under close scrutiny and it will be interesting to
see just how far he's able to get.

Unfortunately, the Justice Department has done a complete 180 on the period
of the Eisenhower Administration and now needs a centrally managed
conglomerate the equivelant of the old Bell System to be able to spy on the
American Citizens so they can completely and formally shred the
Constitution.

This will be an interesting next couple of years.

Bruce Barnes
  

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald E. Kushner
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 21:52
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] worldnet

Dave Doherty wrote:

> SBC bought ATT and then changed their name to ATT. So ATT doesn't 
> exist any longer. What is now called ATT is really SBC.
>
> Not that it makes a lot of difference, except to lawyers and tax 
> people...

And the people who think AT&T bought SBC and will fix 'em.

AT&T's reputation is going to go down the drain. They micromanage their 
customers and their employees.

-Ron

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to