Like I said, this can be argued forever, with neither side "winning". As I recall, the last discussion on this subject went on for ages as well. I contacted our MS Licensing rep and he said (as already reported by Grant Bainbridge's rep) that alternate email server software was fine on Web Edition. As I already suspected, but nice to have a CYA.
Dan Horne Web Services Administrator TAIS / Wilcox Travel Agency [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 11:43 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition > > Web commonly means HTTP and FTP, and often can include SMTP. > So by my logic, FTP would be fine, as would an SMTP server > used by the web services, but POP and IMAP would not. > Logically they would be referred to as "internet" services, > not web. This could be a case of changing semantics over > time, though.... where "web" slowly comes to mean everything > internet related. > > MS includes POP3 and IMAP in the Web Edition??? > > Darin. > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. SPAM-FREE 1.0(2476) To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
