Well, it sure isn't true for 8.15. I run two real domains, and they are
REALLY separate. They run through the same NIC, and the same firewall
(different rules, of course, because they are different IPs').

I believe you are mistaken about 8.2 and 9, but I can only speak what I know
and run. Sniffer trace available on request.

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 2:51 PM
To: Imail
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Multiple IPs and the gateway


> This  is  so  that  we  can  have  their IP blacklisted if they have
> problems  and  not  our  primary  IP.

That's a fallacy unless you have separate physical NICs. The source IP
of  packets coming from a physical NIC will be the primary IP assigned
to  the  NIC in Windows, regardless of secondary IPs also bound to the
card.  This  is  because  the  outbound IMail socket is bound with the
directive INADDR_ANY, which allows Windows to choose the IP. I believe
this was finally fixed in 9.x, but not in your 8.22.

> I  also want to use a gateway with virus and spam filtering that can
> be  tailored  for  each domain and can authenticate users per domain
> regardless of the IP they are using.

"Authenticate"  with  username  and  password?  Do  you  actually mean
"verify" extant recipients?

You  should  be  able  to  continue  to  use  your  mailbox server for
authenticated mail submission by your users.

Yes,  your  gateway  needs  to maintain a list of remote users on your
mailbox  server  so  it  can reject unknown recipients. Just about any
gateway   solution   worth   its  salt  can  do  this.  For  recipient
verification  +  advanced  anti-abuse  at  the  gateway, there's free,
powerful  SMTP with low-cost ORF anti-spam add-on; a cookbook for free
*nix-based  Postfix,  called  IMGate,  maintained  by  Len Conrad; and
numerous  other  options,  commercial  and free, across all platforms.
First criterion will be your OS preference. After that, you have to be
a  lot  more  specific about your desires. Recipient validation + some
level  of  anti-abuse  basically  *define*  a gateway, so they're in a
sense irrelevant to your spec.

--Sandy


------------------------------------
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

SpamAssassin plugs into Declude!
  http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/relea
se/

Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail
Aliases!
  http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/downl
oad/release/
  http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/
release/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to