You da man!  Thanks again.

Matt



Marc Rosamond wrote:
I meant I tested the file that I attached to my prior message. Here it is again. Sorry for the confusion.
    -----Original Message-----
    *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *Matt
    *Sent:* Thursday, May 31, 2007 11:22 AM
    *To:* [email protected]
    *Subject:* Re: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2

    Marc,

    I think you forgot to attach it :)

    Thanks,

    Matt



    Marc Rosamond wrote:
    I tested the file that I attached with 2006.2 and it worked
    correctly for me every time.
    If you run into any problems, post a message here and I'll try to
    help you out with whatever issue you are seeing.

        -----Original Message-----
        *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *Matt
        *Sent:* Thursday, May 31, 2007 11:04 AM
        *To:* [email protected]
        *Subject:* Re: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2

        Marc,

        I do believe that what you said here will in fact solve our
        problem, though it would be good if you could confirm that it
        works with 2006.2 with your tweak.  Please don't hesitate to
        post that here when it is available.

        Thanks,

        Matt



        Marc Rosamond wrote:
        The only difference between 2006 and 2006.1 was an additional hidden 
field
        was added called hdnPwdChanged.  No additional fields were added for 
2006.2
        so the login pages should continue to work.  I took a look the files 
that
        are included with the KB article and the one for 2006 will work if you 
just
        add that hdnPwdChanged field that I mentioned.  The other file which was
        provided by a user appears to work differently from what the article
        mentions.  If you use that file, your username ends up being 
"<enteredUser>"
        and "<enteredPassword>" which of course will result in an invalid login
        message.  It doesn't seem to support being able to pass the username and
        password via the querystring as the original 2006 file did so I am 
guessing
        the user who made it intended for you to hardcode your username and 
password
        in the "<enteredUser>" and "<enteredPassword>" locations.  If hardcoding
        doesn't work for your purposes and you need to pass the values via the
        querystring, you'll need an updated version of the original 2006 file.  
I
        have made one and will have it added to the article page soon.  I will 
also
        attach it to this email.  Let me know if you have any problems with it.
        Thanks.

        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt
        Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 3:38 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2


        I found the following KB article that covers how to do this:

            IMail - How to do Single Sign On with IMail 2006
            http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20051206-DM06.htm

        It lists versions for both 2006 and 2006.1, but not for 2006.2.  I tried
        the 2006.1 version with 2006.2 and had no success (I had a friend who is
        great with JavaScript, XML, etc. stay up late and try to get this to
        work).  We were both too tired to try to start taking apart the code,
        but it appears that this simply won't work the way it was provided.

        I'm wondering if the code in the KB is supposed to work with 2006.2, or
        if there is some code somewhere that could be used to create a custom
        sign-on page.  I've searched the archives as well as the message board
        to no avail thus far, and any help would be appreciated.

        Thanks,

        Matt

        To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
        List Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
        Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to