Marc,

Thanks for this information. I'm going to pass this on to Luis who is probably going to start testing it this afternoon. Our biggest issue is access to Mac's, which he only has at his day job.

Thanks,

Matt



Marc Rosamond wrote:
There are some free javascript classes called "Prototype" that can perform the AJAX fetch and should work under Safari. The webclient uses this in several areas for its AJAX calls. A copy of the prototype javascript file is already in the webclient's javascript folder (prototype.js). The sign on script was just something I threw together quickly so I didn't have time to look into making it work on all browsers and at the time it was initially built Prototype wasn't being used, so I just wrote my own custom code. If you do a Google search for AJAX and prototype you'll most likely find enough information there to get it to work under Safari as well.
 -----Original Message-----
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *Matt
*Sent:* Friday, June 01, 2007 5:13 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2

    Thanks Mike, that saves us some time.  I guess we'll attempt to
    rework the AJAX somehow.  That's not my cut of tea, but Luis is an
    expert at this stuff.

    Matt



    Mike N wrote:
    In terms of the problem with Safari / Ajax fetching the login
    page and re-posting it: my page uses the exact same Ajax
    technique, so I would expect to see the same problem.
Regards, Mike

        ----- Original Message -----
        *From:* Matt <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        *To:* [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Sent:* Friday, June 01, 2007 4:58 PM
        *Subject:* Re: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2

I am thinking about using your code in order to avoid that. Before we dig into it, do you have any idea if you code works
        with Safari browsers?

        Why the hell did Apple decide to create it's own browser
        based on code other than Mozilla anyway???

Reply via email to