Hi Tom, Your action plan and time-table sounds reasonable. Thanks again for the update.
>> The Soft and Hard error settings look at all errors. << Could you define "all" errors? What if the error is "mailbox full"? In an extreme scenario, would an innocent IP address be blocked because one RECIPIENT uses IMAP and didn't empty his mailbox, another went on vacation and a third person left the company and the mailbox no longer exists? Best Regards, Andy -----Original Message----- From: "Tom Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] V10 - Dictionary Attack defense no longer functional -> confirmed! Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 09:44:32 -0400 Reply-To: [email protected] Andy, I should have mentioned in my first response that the help has been updated to properly describe the actions that take place. If the Max Invalid Recipients is set, it only looks at the recipients. The Soft and Hard error settings look at all errors. Therefore, the Hard Error Limit could actually fire if it is higher than the Max Invalid Recipients settings. As far as the UI is concerned, I agree 100%. We are implementing a more user friendly and accurate UI for these settings for the 10.5 release scheduled for later this year. As far as the white list issue, we are looking at this and it will be addressed for the next release. Unfortunately, we are too close to the 10.01 release for any more changes to be added. Thanks, Tom Lewis Ipswitch, Inc. Development Manager - Messaging Products 706-312-3573 To Unsubscribe: http://imailserver.com/support/discussion_list/ List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://imailserver.com/support/kb.html
