> > If I were you, I'd check to see what requirements there are that
> > are convincing them to use >ASP/COM.
> The reason is because the web pages are all going to be in
> generated by COM components. That's the spec. The ASP page
> is going to be very lightweight, just a few lines to call
> the COM object.
That's the problem with people creating specs for things they aren't knowledgeable
about -- they create more work for themselves than they need.
If the spec says you have to do it that way, you probably have to do it that way.
But, you'll either need to use another E-mail program that has a COM interface (or
suitable API), or connect to IMail via POP3/IMAP, which will be about 10 times as much
work as customizing the templates to the way you want them to appear.
Of course, if there is anything that you want on your web interface that IMail's web
messaging can't do (although there isn't much it can't do), and someone has the $$$ to
pay for it, an HTTP->ASP->COM->POP3->IMail interface will be more flexible than an
HTTP->IMail interface.
-Scott
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
