>>
> This may be a really daft question, but why would you want to force your
> users to use your SMTP server as apossed to their ISP's
Good question. I'm not forcing them. Some road warriors have numerous dialup
accounts, which would require different mail settings if they wanted to send
mail using their domain address. If they always use MY mail server they only
need a single mail account, (unless they use ATT).
I only have a few customers setup this way. But those few love it.
Andrew P. Kaplan, CNE, MCSE+Internet, MCT, CCNA, CCDA
CyberShore, Inc. -- Premium Internet Services -- http://www.cshore.com
--- To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Deliduka
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 9:33 AM
> To: Imail Support List
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] unable to send mail through ATT connection
>
>
> On 2/20/01 4:09 AM this was written:
>
> > This may be a really daft question, but why would you want to force your
> > users to use your SMTP server as apossed to their ISP's,. Is it
> not better
> > to have the ISP carry the extra work load than yourselves?
>
> I would think it cuts down on the amount of spam coming from
> their network.
> Granted, AT&T uses uu.net pop's around the country but if what I see at
> spamcop.net when I report my spam, AT&T has almost little to no
> spam reports
> against it.
>
> --
>
> Thomas Deliduka
> IT Manager
> -------------------------
> New Eve Media
> The Solution To Your Internet Angst
> http://www.neweve.com/
>
>
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
