>**DNS is on the same machine, but big deal to move the email off.
>
>**I have MaxQueProc set to 90 right now and doesn't seem to have any affect.

ok, not surprising.  Imail is kinda mysteriously unaggressive when 
delivering mail, for many people.

>**Spool averages about 800 files (not including log files) which are mainly
>retires.  We have the retries set for 4 hours.

Seems like a lot, but it's usually proportional to your total sending 
traffic, and could be goosed up a lot after a spam attack where the 
bounce address is invalid.

>**CPU utilization?  Normal about 8% and normally peaks around 80 to 100%
>when sending the load.

That's really sounds way too heavy for a machine of that power.

Sending mail is not at all CPU intensive, it's disk intensive while 
searching the queue directory. Then each SMTP process usually takes 
10 secs to deliver a msg, where that 10 sec is vastly dominiated by 
waiting on repsonses from DNS and then SMTP session delays with the 
receiving server.

MS DNS is known to be a less efficient on NT that BIND.  Can you 
point Imail at an off-machine DNS to see if it helps?

How many total files in your imail\spool diretory?  You need to keep 
this as small as possible.

>**I have not seen any errors in the log file.  Only normal logging of
>connections, greetings, and either successful exchange or notice of full
>boxes, users not found, etc.

With 800 deferred msgs in the queue, there must be some reasons for 
them to be deferred (mx connect fail, refused connection, no answer, 
etc, etc, etc.

Len

http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : Binary for ISC BIND 8.2.3 for NT4 & W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com  : Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Reply via email to