----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 3:46
AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] IMAP Too
Broken?
I knew that
IMAP on IMail was "clunky" with Outlook... but I had no idea how
bad.
I'm running
IMail with all the latest patches on NT4/SP6a.
I have some
customers who travel, and have tried to use IMAP - a natural
solution.
After only 3
days (All in their main office - not on the road), they're so upset with the
missing messages and failures that they feel like I've given them a bad deal
- even though I warned them ahead of time that there might be some
trouble... In their minds (and I completely understand) "some trouble"
really means "completely unusable", and I've sold them up the
river.
<RANT>
Is IMail's
support of IMAP so broken that I should give up, or are there some things I
can do that will make this reliable. Should I just give up on this
whole mess and go with a different package finally? After all this time, and
all the complaints I've seen on the list (for years) about these problems
with IMAP and the rest of it... it seems like IPswitch is just not
interested in making it work (although they do seem to like to cash our
checks)... same with LDAP (now turned off), email-to-fax (laughable), and
the web interface (a lot better with KWM, but still problematic)... etc,
etc...
It's gotten to
the point where the only thing I can reliably ("cough") run on my IMail
server is SMTP and POP3... The rest of it I have to keep turned off unless I
want trouble... and even then I have to watch the thing carefully to make
sure it's still running day-to-day.
It's getting
quickly to the point where I can't bill enough for email service to
break even on the cost of support and maintenance... and I have a
_small_ system w/ high-end customers!!. Hats off to you guys that make this
POC work in a large-scale production environment... let alone free email
services... you're either crazy and don't know it yet, you own an
orchard of money trees, honed your business skills as used car
salesmen, or you've captured the market on umpalumpas to cover your
labor costs.
</RANT>
Does anybody
have this (IMAP) working right?
Please
advise.
Thanks,
_M