----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Mathews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 06:41 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum]RFC's? off topic Q
> i thought it was worse form, that knowing all that, you stll include the
51
> messages in the thread. this is supposed to be plain text, with no
> stationary, i may have a corrupt registry. if you complain long enough and
> loud enough, folks will set their client like i do to reply in the
> 'received' format so you send html to them flaming them for using html
>
> len i "received" your message as html. there 9 settings for me to play
> with. i might. i might not. the format received may be some setting
> allowing me to override inbound settings with my stationary choice. i'd
> never use stationary, but the suits say it 'looks' tacky. hey, IMAIL,
how
> come i don't have this problem with third party vendors in the iis 4 list
> that i subscribe to. it comes to me as an email with emails within as
> attachments.
>
> i can really reply there with the setttings of the person who sent out to
> the list retained by my client. for whatever reason their server really
> does override my settings so that i can reply text to a text user,
formatted
> to everyone else. i will get some more rfc AD info and soon will drop
> this.
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
