If you check the archives people just discussed this in a thread titled access vs
something or something like that. I won't bring it all up again except to say:
Many of us disagree with the statement below. I run internal db with 35,000+ users -
others talk of 100,000. Hardly the limit of a few thousand.
Chet
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Baden Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:10:56 +1000
>
>errm, scalability, integration with CRM interfaces ...
>
>i think you'll find the general feeling is that Imail DB is OK for up to
>perhaps several thousand users (maybe), but an SQL back end, either MS SQL
>Server or something else assists greatly in those areas ...
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bill Foresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 3 July 2001 10:19 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [IMail Forum] choice of DB's
>>
>>
>> I noticed on the list that many of you are using SQL server
>> as your choice
>> of DB's as opposed to the iMail DB? Is it better to do this and why?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>> to be removed from this list.
>>
>> An Archive of this list is available at:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>>
>
>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>to be removed from this list.
>
>An Archive of this list is available at:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
