Sorry Len, that's 40K per DC under NT4 with at least one more BDC. And that
number is probably a conservative number for Imail since they calculate that
based on almost all the users having roaming profiles and machine/user
policies that have to be served. M$ RULZ! :P
Craig.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Len Conrad
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 3:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] choice of DB's
>If you check the archives people just discussed this in a thread titled
>access vs something or something like that. I won't bring it all up again
>except to say:
>
>Many of us disagree with the statement below. I run internal db with
>35,000+ users - others talk of 100,000. Hardly the limit of a few
thousand.
yep, it�s seems anamolous that Imail can successfully support so many
registry records since the registry is know to be an under performer.
I think MS said long ago that they don�t recommend more than about 14K
users in the NT users database. But what do they know about systems design?
Len
http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND 8.2.4 for NT4 & W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-abuse mail gateways
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
