---------- Original Message -------------------------
---------
From: "Todd Lahman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:39:22 -0700
Sounds like you need a Postfix relay/gateway. That
would certainly offload a lot of SMTP traffic to the
Postfix machine, and if you find you get a ton of
deferrals you can setup another Postfix machine to
only handle deferred mail. Len has information on
his site to immediately get started using FreeBSD or
you can check out the documentation that is coming
for RedHat 7.1 on www.postfixgate.com when it is
available.
----- Original Message -----
From: Vincent
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 6:11 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Windows 2000 better than NT
for IMail?
Hi,
I am looking for general information as I know one
would need more info to judge my situation. I am in
the thinking stages now and could use some input.
I have a NT server 800 MHz, 256 MB RAM and am
running IMail with about 8000 users. These are very
very heavy users (Most are on several mailing list,
etc) and my number of users increase every day for
about 20+. I am having problems with system crashes.
I am more of a Unix person and not used to using
Windows for email.
Could I be better off using Windows 2000? Should
my NT system be able to handle the load as it is now?
Any comments would be helpful.
Thank you for your time,
Vincent
_____________________________________________________
___________
Sent via the KillerWebMail system at
killerwebmail.com
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
