>Is this good? I mean, should you have to do this?
600 msgs/ 600 secs = 1 sec
>We sent out about 5000, and it slowed to a pinful trickle taking about
>2+ hours to send out. Was I troubleshooting for nothing because this is
>expected performance?
not expected or welcome, but it is widely reported here that Imail will
often not deliver at full throttle when confronted with a big list spike or
big queue buildup.
>I would expect the performance to well exceed this... that is something
>like 1 per second according to your figures (i think).
10 to 20 second is doable with other mail engines.
>A strong relay server (i know imail isn't simply a relay server) should
>dwarf that number, no?
yes, 30k to 60K / hour is acheivable, but not with Imail reliably. As John
said, his requirements were very lightweight so he�s happy with the results.
Len
http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND 8.2.4 for NT4 & W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-abuse mail gateways
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
