My $0.02.
The trouble with authorizing SMTP access based on a domain is that
spammers have no issues with faking the source domain of their email...
In fact, that's something they do a lot... so your server would be wide
open to them.

HOWEVER, Declude HiJack is intened to solve precisely the problem you
seem to have. You might look into that as part of your solution.

Here is an excerpt from the Declude site:

Declude Hijack prevents unwanted mass mailings. The primary benefit is that
it allows you to run an open relay, while preventing spammers from hijacking
your mail server. Another major benefit is that it will catch your own users
who may be sending out spam. Other benefits include minimizing or
eliminating virus outbreaks, and eliminating some types of mail loops.

Hope this helps,

_M

| -----Original Message-----
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Pajor
| Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:00 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] smtp vs. pop accounts...
|
|
| Tony, thanks for the insight... although that may work in an ISP
| situation where everyone would be local, no one is... We have many
| domains and people are all over the place, thus the need to use smtp
| auth., with no mail relay enabled.
|
| What would be better is to have a domain wide option to enable/disable
| SMTP sending.  I believe there's something like this for pop going
| domain wide.
|
|
| Thursday, January 31, 2002, 10:23:53 AM, you wrote:
|
| > Under the SMTP security tab:
| > - check disable SMTP auth reporting (which disables SMTP auth)
| > - under relay options - no mail relay.
|
| > The only mail your SMTP process will handle is for users that
| are local to
| > your server.
|
| > If you have other machines (like your workstations in your network) that
| > need to send mail out, use 'relay for addresses' and enter the IP
| > addresses/ranges of those who can relay.
|
| > - Tony
|
| >> -----Original Message-----
| >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Pajor
| >> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:53 AM
| >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >> Subject: [IMail Forum] smtp vs. pop accounts...
| >>
| >>
| >> Hi all,
| >>
| >> Wondering if there is a way to lock out the use of smtp auth to send
| >> mail when the user has a pop mailbox.  We offer pop boxes to many
| >> customers, but don't want them using us to send out their mail, and I
| >> haven't seen anything on this.  Anyone deal with something similar?
| >>
| >>
| >> Cheers!
| >> Jeff
| >>
| >>
| >> --------------
| >> Jeff Pajor, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| >> System Administrator                                  Web-worx LLC
| >> Tel: +1 203 758 3620
| > http://www.web-worx.com
| > Fax: +1 203 758 6847
| > 18 Waterbury Rd., Box 7233, Prospect, CT 06712 USA
|
|
| > 09112001 Never forget....
|
|
| > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
| > to be removed from this list.
|
| > An Archive of this list is available at:
| > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
| > ---
| > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by http://www.intouchmi.com]
|
|
| > ---
| > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by http://www.intouchmi.com]
|
|
| > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
| > to be removed from this list.
|
| > An Archive of this list is available at:
| > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
|
|
| Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
| to be removed from this list.
|
| An Archive of this list is available at:
| http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
|
|


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Reply via email to