Interesting data.

>> - 3 came from Canada (BellNexxia 65.93.160.0/19,

There's that bellnexxia.net again !!!!

Andrew P. Kaplan
Network Administrator
CyberShore, Inc.
http://www.cshore.com


"Your mouse has moved. Windows NT must be restarted for the change to take
effect. Reboot now? [ OK ]"






> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Len Conrad
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Need Help - Virus Attack?
>
>
>
> >Not knowing the details IP addressing I blocked 61.0.0.0/61.255.255.255
> >addesses.
>
> one notation is 61/8, or 61.0.0.0/8.  that's a whole Class A.
>
> or
>
> 61.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0
>
> >Is
> >61.183.0.0/61.184.255.255 the subnet I should be blocking?
>
> that notation would be 61.183/16
>
> or
>
> 61.183.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0
>
> btw, if this gets up you jingo knee a-jerkin, here's a message from the
> snort list today.  the guy set up a honey pot and watched it with snort:
>
> I used LaBrea in this way - created a bogus /24 off my production
> network, poked a global allow for that /24 at my border, fired
> up LaBrea and Snort on an unaddressed laptop on the /24, and
> listened.
>
> Some points of order regarding this quasi-honeypot:
>
> - no dns, no outbound traffic, no nothing to indicate to an external
>          party that the subnet even existed - thus, any traffic coming to
>          that network was either misdirected or hostile;
>
> - historically, the subnet had been unused and unallocated out of our
>          /16 core (.edu network) for over two years;
>
> - the subnet came into existence on Thu Dec 20 2001 sometime
> after 4:15 p.m.;
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> - in the first full day of listening (December 21st) - one 24-hour period:
>                                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ================================================================
> - 1,702 different external hosts attempted at least one initial
> TCP connection;
>
> - 1,026 attempted more than one;
>
> - 335 attempted 20 or more;
>
> - 71 attempted 255 or more, thereby scanning the entire subnet
> multiple times -
>          of the top 60 or so:
>
>          - 12 unique IP's came from U.S. educational institutions
>          (UCLA 128.97.0.0/16, UVA 128.143.0.0/16, UGA 128.192.0.0/16,
>          SunyBuffalo 128.205.0.0/16, UWA 128.208.0.0/16,
>          UHI 128.171.0.0/16, SunyBinghamtom 128.226.0.0/16,
>          Syracuse 128.230.0.0/16, WashUStLouis 128.252.0.0/16,
>          UOKNorman 129.15.0.0/16, UMI 131.213.0.0/16);
>
>          - 12 unique IP's came from US providers (HSACorp 24.240.23.0/24,
>          AOL 172.128.0.0/10, rr.com 24.24.0.0/13sortof,
> genuity.net 4.0.0.0/8,
>          naxs.com 216.98.64.0/19, arnet 209.40.128.0/18, UUNET
> 208.254.72.0/23,
>          Comastpc.com 68.40.0.0/13, @home 65.9.112.0/20,
>          SBCIS/PacBell 63.192.0.0/12);
>
>          - 5 came from a random US ".com" (tag.com 216.177.32.0/19,
>          mrws.net 63.166.61.0/24, "Oilgear" (AT&T) 209.36.148.0/24,
>          BritSys.com 192.216.171.0/24, RuralNet 216.169.69.32/27);
>
>          - 3 came from Canada (BellNexxia 65.93.160.0/19,
>          ShawFiberlink 24.80.0.0/13, hyperlinx.net 207.107.55.0/24);
>
>          - 3 came from Mexico (UnivAutonomaZacatecas 148.217.0.0/16,
>          MERKANET 200.23.95.0/24, Avantel 148.240.0.0/16);
>
>          - 2 came from South America (cable.net.co-Colombia
> 200.68.160.0/21,
>          ImpSat-Venezuela 200.31.4.0/24);
>
>          - 5 came from Germany (denoc.net 62.116.128.0/20,
>          JWGoethe-UnivFrankfurt 141.2.0.0/16, t-online.com
> 80.128.0.0/12sortof,
>          t-online.com 217.80.0.0/12sortof);
>
>          - 4 came from France (internet-fr.net 212.37.210.0/22,
>          wanadoo 217.128.39.0/24, wanadoo 193.252.192.0/24,
>          wanadoo 80.13.214.0/24);
>
>          - 2 came from Norway (nextgentel.com 213.145.160.0/19,
>          NTANET 128.39.0.0/16);
>
>          - 2 came from the Netherlands (tiscali.nl 195.241.0.0/16,
>          UnivUtrecht 131.211.0.0/16);
>
>          - 6 came from other European countries
>          (InstitutoDaAgua-Portugal 193.136.235.0/24,
>          Lidkopings-Sweden 195.84.233.128/26, MedUnivLodz-Poland
> 212.5.198.0/23,
>          telefonica.es-Spain 213.96.0.0/15, tin.it-Italy 62.211.128.0/17,
>          hispeed.ch-Switzerland 217.162.0.0/16sortof);
>
>          - 1 came from Australia (bigpond.net.au 203.40.0.0/13);
>
>          - 1 came from India (vsnl.net 203.199.84.128/26);
>
>          - 9 came from Korea (rapitel.co.kr 211.189.198.0/25,
>          KoreaTelecom 128.134.0.0/16, nuri.net 210.1221.56.192/26,
>          kornet.net 61.73.128.0/20sortof, kornet 61.73.152.0/21sortof);
>
>          - 2 came from China (Chinanet 202.104.0.0/16,
>          LianyungangFoodMfry 61.155.96.0/19sortof);
>
>          - 1 came from Taiwan (TANET 140.109.0.0/16);
>
>          - 1 came from Japan (u-tokyo.ac.jp 133.11.0.0/16);
>
> - activity peaks occurred 6-7am (97 hits), 11-12am (148), 5-6pm (158),
>          6-7pm (202), and 7-8pm (295); [all times CST]
>
> - most of these were reconnaissance (see below).
> ================
> - of the initial connection attempts, 845 were to HTTP port 80 (presumably
>          Code Red, Nimda, or more serious Web attackers), 243
> were to FTP port
>          21 (widely vulnerable), 242 were to SOCKS/Wingate port
> 1080 (widely
>          exploitable), 232 were to ssh port 22 (recent exploits), and 14
>          were to portmapper port 111 (an oldie but a goodie - widely
>          exploitable, but most people block it nowadays)
> ================
> - 56 hosts completed a TCP connection, 53 more than one, 43 hosts
> completed
>          20 or more, and 9 hosts completed 255 or more; this number was
>          presumably attempting exploits in realtime.
> ================
> - 4 internal security issues were detected:
>          3 incidences of Code Red or Nimda
>          1 incidence of a compromised internal machine portscanning ssh
> ================
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.325 / Virus Database: 182 - Release Date: 2/19/02
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.325 / Virus Database: 182 - Release Date: 2/19/02


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Reply via email to