> agreed, but it is a pretty good implementation of B-Tree, and is a local > filesystem that can be cached in memory and in local disk > controller. Going through ODBC over tcp/ip at 100 mbits/sec is still a > bunch of code that isn't executed with registry access, and registry access > doesn't have the network latency of tcp/ip. And just how great is the > multi-threading of Imail ODBC driver and of ODBC itself. Would OLEDB be > much faster/more efficient? >
OLEDB would be much faster and more efficient than ODBC for sure! Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked questions: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
