I'm all for the prosecution method. Or a minimum 5 years in a mexico prison!
;-) ~Rick Sanford Whiteman wrote: >>Of course, when people hear that it is impossible to stop the >>spammer using technological methods, they usually just resort to >>using technological methods to stop the bounce messages >> > > ...which does, you have to admit, make sense...even though the > get-in-touch-with-their-ISP solution treats the cause directly, it > takes considerably more time to get sure results, and time is often in > short supply. > > Of course, that all changes when the human behind the impersonated > sender actually gets accused of originating the spam. Good to use both > options, using the filter to catch symptoms/evidence at a management > level (so the user never knows and freaks out), then taking > non-technological action. > > -Sandy ___________________________________________________________________ Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E-Mail System. Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked questions: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
