I think the safest design decision here is to create a second table for your redirection information and use a join in the query to retrieve it. This way the Imail part of it is inconsequential and can be handled independently. If the interface changes on either side - you only have the one side to deal with.
MHO. _M | -----Original Message----- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Ingram | Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:08 AM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SQL Fields | | | Good morning, | I am use the same SQLDB for our agents to log into our web | pages as Imail uses and that is working fine, but I would | like to add a couple extra fields ...so my question is will | that interfere with Imail? Imail will not use these fields | they will be used to direct agents to the correct page and or | info they should only have access to. I really don't see how | it would but I do not have a test system at this time and I | know Imail can act funny so is this doable? I did check the | KB and I am going to the archive now. | | Thanks | ~Paul~ | | --- | [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus/McAfee] | | | Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html | to be removed from this list. | | An Archive of this list is available at: | http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%| 40list.ipswitch.com/ | | | Please visit the Knowledge Base for | answers to frequently asked | questions: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ | | Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked questions: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
