In April, we started to go through our spamtraps (E-mail addresses designed 
to collect spam), to find out which spam tests were most effective at 
catching spam.  The results this month are based on over 11,000 spams that 
were received, all in September, 2002.  In September, our spamtraps 
received 10% more spam than in August (August was 15% more spam than July, 
and July was about 15% higher than June).

The following is a list of tests that we run against the E-mails arriving 
at the spamtrap, and what percentage of the spam they caught (it will be 
easier to read if you use a fixed-width font):


WEIGHT10         96.51%
WEIGHT20         89.04%
SNIFFER          85.29%
SPAMCOP          69.38%
XBL              50.80%
MAILDEFLECTOR    48.37%
SPAMHEADERS      42.46%
REVDNS           42.18%
MONKEYPROXIES    35.93%
NJABL            31.56%
HELO             30.56%
HEUR10           29.00%
BADHEADERS       24.83%
DSBLALL          24.71%
NOPOSTMASTER     24.64%
POSTFIXGATE      24.30%
NOABUSE          22.33%
DSBL             22.26%
DORKZTL          21.47%
OSSRC            20.65%
OSPROXY          19.27%
OSRELAY          15.66%
HEUR9            15.20%
ORDB             14.59%
DNSRBL-SPAM      14.26%
BLARSBL          13.91%
SPAMHAUS         13.74%
KUNDENSERVER     13.37%
ROUTING          12.83%
RSL              12.58%
BLITZEDALL       11.48%
IPWHOIS          11.47%
BADWHOIS         10.81%
DORKS             9.76%
HEUR8             8.51%
OSSOFT            8.10%
BLITZEDHTTP       7.92%
DEVNULL           7.21%
BASE64            4.76%
DNSRBL-DUN        4.59%
BLITZEDSOCKS      4.54%
DSBLMULTI         3.15%
DSN               2.70%
FABELSOURCES      2.61%
DELINK            1.96%
MAILFROM          1.64%
KITHRUP           1.49%
COMPU             1.48%
NJABLDUL          1.33%
DORKRELAYS        1.00%
PIGS              0.89%
OSDUL             0.68%
MONKEYFORMMAIL    0.35%
BLITZEDWINGATE    0.31%
DNSUCE            0.22%
OSSMART           0.01%


The WEIGHT10 and WEIGHT20 tests are just a weighting system that assigns a 
weight to each E-mail, based on the spam tests that fail, so they don't 
really count as spam tests by themselves (although they do catch the most 
spam).

The two best tests by far are SNIFFER ( http://www.sortmonster.com ) at 
85.29% and SPAMCOP ( http://www.spamcop.net ) at 69.38% (although SPAMCOP 
has gone down since last month, when it caught 75.16% of the spam).

More information on most of the various spam tests shown above can be found 
at http://www.declude.com/junkmail/support/ip4r.htm .  You can look up an 
IP address using the Spam Database Lookup tool at http://www.DNSstuff.com 
.  The most recent 20 spams in our spamtraps, and the tests they failed, 
can be found at http://www.declude.com/spamtrap.htm .

                                                    -Scott
---
Declude: Anti-virus, Anti-spam and Anti-hijacking solutions for 
IMail.  http://www.declude.com

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to