What is the general concensus about using sniffer and declude together?

Thanks, Andy

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 12:50:25 -0400

>In April, we started to go through our spamtraps (E-mail addresses designed 
>to collect spam), to find out which spam tests were most effective at 
>catching spam.  The results this month are based on over 11,000 spams that 
>were received, all in September, 2002.  In September, our spamtraps 
>received 10% more spam than in August (August was 15% more spam than July, 
>and July was about 15% higher than June).
>
>The following is a list of tests that we run against the E-mails arriving 
>at the spamtrap, and what percentage of the spam they caught (it will be 
>easier to read if you use a fixed-width font):
>
>
>WEIGHT10         96.51%
>WEIGHT20         89.04%
>SNIFFER          85.29%
>SPAMCOP          69.38%
>XBL              50.80%
>MAILDEFLECTOR    48.37%
>SPAMHEADERS      42.46%
>REVDNS           42.18%
>MONKEYPROXIES    35.93%
>NJABL            31.56%
>HELO             30.56%
>HEUR10           29.00%
>BADHEADERS       24.83%
>DSBLALL          24.71%
>NOPOSTMASTER     24.64%
>POSTFIXGATE      24.30%
>NOABUSE          22.33%
>DSBL             22.26%
>DORKZTL          21.47%
>OSSRC            20.65%
>OSPROXY          19.27%
>OSRELAY          15.66%
>HEUR9            15.20%
>ORDB             14.59%
>DNSRBL-SPAM      14.26%
>BLARSBL          13.91%
>SPAMHAUS         13.74%
>KUNDENSERVER     13.37%
>ROUTING          12.83%
>RSL              12.58%
>BLITZEDALL       11.48%
>IPWHOIS          11.47%
>BADWHOIS         10.81%
>DORKS             9.76%
>HEUR8             8.51%
>OSSOFT            8.10%
>BLITZEDHTTP       7.92%
>DEVNULL           7.21%
>BASE64            4.76%
>DNSRBL-DUN        4.59%
>BLITZEDSOCKS      4.54%
>DSBLMULTI         3.15%
>DSN               2.70%
>FABELSOURCES      2.61%
>DELINK            1.96%
>MAILFROM          1.64%
>KITHRUP           1.49%
>COMPU             1.48%
>NJABLDUL          1.33%
>DORKRELAYS        1.00%
>PIGS              0.89%
>OSDUL             0.68%
>MONKEYFORMMAIL    0.35%
>BLITZEDWINGATE    0.31%
>DNSUCE            0.22%
>OSSMART           0.01%
>
>
>The WEIGHT10 and WEIGHT20 tests are just a weighting system that assigns a 
>weight to each E-mail, based on the spam tests that fail, so they don't 
>really count as spam tests by themselves (although they do catch the most 
>spam).
>
>The two best tests by far are SNIFFER ( http://www.sortmonster.com ) at 
>85.29% and SPAMCOP ( http://www.spamcop.net ) at 69.38% (although SPAMCOP 
>has gone down since last month, when it caught 75.16% of the spam).
>
>More information on most of the various spam tests shown above can be found 
>at http://www.declude.com/junkmail/support/ip4r.htm .  You can look up an 
>IP address using the Spam Database Lookup tool at http://www.DNSstuff.com 
>.  The most recent 20 spams in our spamtraps, and the tests they failed, 
>can be found at http://www.declude.com/spamtrap.htm .
>
>                                                    -Scott
>---
>Declude: Anti-virus, Anti-spam and Anti-hijacking solutions for 
>IMail.  http://www.declude.com
>
>---
>[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
>

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to