>I'm trying to determine if declude and imgate provide some of the same >basic functionality. If imgate will kill most of my spam before imail gets it
it will >, this is the cheapest solution - just gotta do the config. Declude's >easy install is a plus (ie- no separate server). > >Does it make sense to run both declude and imgate? sure, IMGate to reduce the spam, block DoS/dico attacks, block dangerous attachments, deal with remote crappy senders, send to remote crappy recipients, enforce global max msg size in and out, etc, etc. Note that much of IMGate is automatic, not manual. Declude AV is still needed for the infections that get past IMGate's attachment rejections. Declude Junk has the heuristics which IMGate basic doesn't have. But I plan to add Microneil's Message Sniffer and/or Vipul's Razor to IMGate "advanced" for the heuristics. There is no conflict between Declude and IMGate, each has different strengths, and applies them in different places. Len To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
