Slightly off topic: How well does the Message Sniffer work on IMGate? The web site info looks good but I was wondering if the additional money is worth it. I mean, how much more percentage wise (than a standard IMGate using RBL) can the Message Sniffer stop? Anyone ever do any benchmarks?
Thanks! Andy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Len Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 12:37 PM Subject: RE: RE: [IMail Forum] IMGATE vs. DECLUDE > > >We have one Imail system on a > >dual 2.4GHZ Xeon > >2GB Ram > >36GB Raid 1 > >F-prot > >Declude Junkmail / HiJack /Virus > >30,000 accounts & 150 domains > >We only see a CPU load of 5% to 40% > >And 20% mem usage. > > > >Why do you need FeeBSD? > > For IMGate (and the *nix version of Message Sniffer), you use a FreeBSD or > Linux as the SMTP gateway. > > Len > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
