Would a viable compromise be to have the domains with the more demanding email usage be on dedicated IP's and then the domains with the minimal email requirements be ipless(virtual) all on that same imail box?
John ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Bud Durland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >John Moore wrote: > >>This flies ok in reverse dns lookups, etc? >> >>This would be a great solution costwise. >> >>Are there any arguments in favor of having dedicated ip's? >> > >Reverse DNS basically looks up the PTR record for an IP address. Without >dedicated IP's there may be confusion. For example, you'll define a >mail host in each domain, then an MX record to point to that host. For >example -- after all is said and done the MX records for both >'domain1.com' and 'domain2.com' may both resolve to 192.168.1.1. Yet a >reverse lookup for that IP address returns the original PTR record, >which may be 'imail.305spin.com' > >A more tangible advantage to dedicated IP addresses is that users won't >have to use the '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' syntax for their user id when >connecting to the iMail server to get mail. > > >-- >---------------------------------------------------------------- >Bud Durland, CNE [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax: 518-561-0017 >---------------------------------------------------------------- >For sale: Parachute. Like new, used once. Small stain. >---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
