How many people actually control their own reverse dns? Where worked for an ISP we had 
our reverse DNS set up this way. The place where I have my servers asked me what I 
wanted my reverse DNS to be called, but I just left it as the default. Travis is 
right, they must be rejecting alot of e-mail.
Scott

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Travis Rabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:28:26 -0800

>Usually the problem is that people don't have a reverse entry at all.  The
>fact that you have one, should be okay.  Yes, it would be nice to match the
>reverse with the forward, but there is no such RFC or rule that I know of
>that states that this is necessary.  I would say more than likely that this
>ISP is a little overzealous.  If they reject mail where the reveres name
>does not match the forward, they must reject A LOT of mail.
>
>Travis
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Navarre
>Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 10:24 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [IMail Forum] Reverse DNS Question
>
>A client of mine told me that he couldn't send email to a particular
>address. The intended
>recipient's ISP is blocking the message.
>
>After contacting the ISP in question, they sent me the following reply:
>
>> The reverse DNS entry on the server's IP should match one of
>> the server's forward DNS names, for example
>> "mail.netinteraction.com" or "mx1.netinteraction.com", so
>> that it can be easily recognized by other sites as a
>> legitimate mail server.  Right now, the reverse entry is
>> "208-151-247-226.netinteraction.com", which is not very helpful.
>
>The host name for the Imail server is netinteraction.com, so my
>understanding is that this my
>reverse DNS is "by the book".
>
>I have two questions. The first question is how should I respond to these
>folks? Is there any merit
>whatsoever in what they are saying? Does anyone have a reference that I can
>point them to that
>clearly states why this  is incorrect?
>
>The 2nd question is even if these guys are not respecting valid
>configurations, is there a "best
>practice" that would make my life easier when it comes to overzealous ISPs?
>
>Paul Navarre
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
>

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to