there are many trade-offs in life, you can buy harder tires and get
better mileage but they won't hold the road as well.
I'll look into ClamD, thanks.
R. Scott Perry wrote:
Those "hits" need to be qualified as to exactly what they are.
I'm really comparing system overhead here. Clam takes a big chunk out
of the processor when it runs while f-prot barely even registers.
Send out a 10K user newsletter and this becomes a problem.
Interesting -- you started the thread with "My concern is that it
doesn't seem to catch as many viruses as Clam. Can anyone confirm
this?". Once we confirmed that it is an illusion, and that F-Prot
catches just as many viruses as ClamAV, you've come up with another
question (performance). It works best if you either start a new
thread, or if continuing the same one, at least *ask* the question
rather than tell someone there response is irrelevant (when it is not).
In any case, I've heard that some of our Declude Virus users who use
ClamAV (typically along with F-Prot) are using ClamD, which helps
improve the performance.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
mailservers since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in
mailserver vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
----
This outgoing message is guaranteed to be authentic by Message Level
users.
Guarantee the authenticity of your email @ http://www.messagelevel.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
