Hey Len, Every so often one of Len's messages comes through marked as spam. He's the only person on this list where this happens, and I really have more faith that he has his email setup correctly than I have that our spam filtering is correct. So I'm trying to figure out why this happens. Here is the source from a recent message.
Ben Bednarz **************************************************************************** *************** Received: from list.ipswitch.com [156.21.1.21] by bcw6.bcwebhost.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.15) id AB61A301CE; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:16:01 -0800 Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com [81.255.84.75] by list.ipswitch.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AC41CECF017E; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:19:45 -0500 Received: from VirusGate.MEIway.com (virusgate.meiway.com [81.255.84.76]) by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id 9E1C2471908 for <[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:13:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from localhost (localhost.MEIWay.com [127.0.0.1]) by VirusGate.MEIway.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 405D438669D for <[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:13:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) X-AV-Checked: Fri Feb 25 19:13:39 2005 virusgate.meiway.com Received: from mail.Go2France.com (ms1.meiway.com [81.255.84.73]) by VirusGate.MEIway.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2355D386658 for <[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:13:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from tx2.Go2France.com [24.227.147.226] by mail.Go2France.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.07) id A81F94103AC; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:02:07 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:13:28 -0600 To: [email protected] From: Len Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: SPAM [5]Re: [IMail Forum] Windows TCP/IP Filtering In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [email protected] X-RBL-Warning: BADHEADERS: This E-mail was sent from a broken mail client [a004010f]. X-RBL-Warning: ROUTING: This E-mail was routed in a poor manner consistent with spam [a004010f]. X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [156.21.1.21] X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for spam. X-Spam-Tests-Failed: BADHEADERS, ROUTING, WEIGHT5, WEIGHT5r [5] X-Note: This E-mail was sent from list.ipswitch.com ([156.21.1.21]). X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status: U X-UIDL: 401605649 >I agree with Scott with this caveat...some firewalls will lock down the >outbound >1024 to prevent application hijacking. So in these cases you have >to allow the apps outbound privileges. But "network-security" firewalls don't know about "applications", only protocols, ip's, ports. That's why I mentioned a "host-security" firewall, like Zone Alarm, which controls applications and OS services (and malicious stuff) that are attempting egress. SA also has per-block logging. Len _____________________________________________________________________ http://IMGate.MEIway.com : free anti-spam gateway, runs on 1000's of sites To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
