Our queue manager has 200 as value for "max delivery threads"
20 for "max retry threads"
and 20 for "listen pipes"
 
I'm not sure if this are "the best" settings but I can't see any delivery
errors and so I mean they are fine.
 
Markus
 
 


  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 3:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] To anyone who bought a 3Com Nic


Markus,
         Did you happen to alter any of the defaults for Imails SMTP
settings (i.e. sessions, threads, etc.)?  You push as much email as we do
per server, be interested in what you have your defaults at.  Thanks for the
time.
 
Keith

-----Original Message----- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Markus Gufler 
Sent: Tue 3/1/2005 12:10 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Cc: 
Subject: [IMail Forum] To anyone who bought a 3Com Nic



Note: maybe this is not new for certain people on this list but as it was 
not easy for me to resolve it, and also neither Ipswitch seems to know this.

So I want to tell you what happened me with our brand new server: 

Our new Win2k3 Dell server with Dual Xeon CPU's, 2 Intel and 2 Broadcom 
Nic's has had the problems that after a short time of higher smtp traffic 
more and more connections failed. This problem was already described by 
several people on this list, and Ipswitch's solution was to buy "a bether 
NIC" (I must laugh again any time I hear it :-) 

Well, the problem was here, the new machine seemed working poorer then our 
previous "4 year old noname-assembled server" with realtek NICs. 

It was a little bit of work to explain to other people in my company that we

need a "bether NIC", nobody has heard this before even if working for over 
15 years in the hardware/server business. Ok new 3Com neek arrived, disabled

4 (four!) preconfigured Dell NICs and attached the 3Com card to the network.


Run the test again: gatewaying 1000 messages each one send with a delay of 
300 ms trough the server. (more the 260000 msgs/day) 
Surprise! The previously in hundreds appearing "MX CONNECT FAILED" and 
"status=3"-lines in the logfiles has reduced down to around 30. 

But successfull delivering 970 fom 1000 messages it not acceptable, even if 
the missing 30 was requeued and delivered with the next queue run! 

Searching the archives I've found Sanford Whiteman's post about TCP registry

settings: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg94971.html 

After changing this two values (TcpTimedWaitDelay: 60 seconds / MaxUserPort 
= 25000 ports) there was not more one single "MX connect failed" or 
"status=3" in the logfiles. All messages was delivered immediately. 

Watching the "forgotten" TCP-connections left by Imail in WAIT-STATE with 
"netstat -n 5" I've discovered that the connections from the random local 
port to the remote port 25 remain in wait state for a to long time 
(default=240 seconds) so that after reaching the default MaxUserPorts limit 
of 5000 and beginning new from port 1 on each try to connect from an local 
port already in WAIT-STATE will cause a MX CONNECT FAIL and so a requeueing 
of this message. 

So by reducing the TCPTimedWaitDelay down to 60 and increasing the 
MaxUserPort there was enough time for the OS  to free up the forgotten 
WAIT-STATE connections before the connection limit was reached and so there 
is no more conflict and no more errors. (until the number of processed 
messages in a short timerange will become high enough to catch the tail 
again) 

Now back to the subject of my post: Removed the 3Com re-enabled the Intel 
Nic with the new registry settings suggested by Sanford: No errors even if 
sending 400000 messages trough the server. It seems to me that the onboard 
NIC of the DELL processor are even more performant then the 3Com nic but 
that is not confirmed by a scientific test. 

So please forward the bills of your 3Com NICs to Ipswitch, or maybe ask a 
credit to buy ICS...  ;-) 

Markus 


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ 
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ 

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to