|
great, super. glad you're happy. Eric Parsons wrote: I went the ICS route due to the fact that we have been running imail since 2000, I have not had as many issues as all the others on this board encountered so I usually keep quite. Since the conversion from Imail standalone to ICS there has been some chit chat about other products that are better(Smartermail and others along that route). I have installed most modules of ICS except WGS. I have also made some recommendations to Ipswitch about imail and having the web interface include an option to add spammail domains manually to the url black list. As for IM I have asked them to add permissions so that some users do not have rights to send messages. As for the cost of Imail and ICS I did not see the drastic increase price for renewal of the support agreement like others forecasted.-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 2:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Spam features on WEB Maybe because he is still using Imail Server, the product that many of us supported for years. We do have much invested in the product in both time and money and personally I want to get as much from out investment as possible. I guess you did not put a dime in the pot yourself. Some of us has been around for years. Eric Parsons wrote: |
- Re: [IMail Forum] Spam features on WEB Matrosity Tech Support
- RE: [IMail Forum] Spam features on WEB William Van Hefner
- Re: [IMail Forum] Spam features on WEB IMail
- Re: [IMail Forum] Spam features on WEB Rod Dorman
- [IMail Forum] v6net Will
- Re: [IMail Forum] v6net E. Shanbrom \(Ipswitch\)
