There's another way. Partial Class-c reverse DNS can be delegated. I didn't
think that was the case, so when I asked my ISP (Sprint) to set up reverse
for my 63.171.93.0/27 with host01.visioncomm.net,
host02.visioncomm.net, host03 ... host31.visioncomm.net, they said they'd be
happy to, but wouldn't I rather do it myself?

So, I now do authoritative, delegated, reverse DNS for my own eighth of a
class-C. Now addresses like those assigned to mail.visioncomm.net,
router.visioncomm.net, weather.visioncomm.net etc. resolve as one would
expect, and as I control.

I don't know HOW they do it, but it's working fine<g>.

hth

Dan Barker



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ken Weise
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 9:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] PTR records on our own Class C


Sorry all, I was out of town over the weekend. I had previously checked on
ARIN, and saw that Valueweb is authoritative for our IP block. However, they
say that since they don't manage the domain (econocaribe.net), they can't
create the PTR records for it. I've been back and forth with them many
times, and have made no headway. That's why I came to the list with the
question, because I wanted to make sure I was interpreting the info
correctly. I was in a hurry in the original email, and didn't specify that I
had already saw this info, that was my fault. Anyway, thanks to everyone for
confirming what I thought, now I have to figure out how to make Valueweb
understand that they can create a PTR record for us.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 7:28 PM
To: Bill Landry
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] PTR records on our own Class C

> Yes,  but  it's  the  wrong  answer  that  sends  someone  off on an
> unnecessary wild-goose chase. . .

Not  truly  a  wild-goose  chase,  as  the  ISP  --  usually much more
responsive  by  phone  than  a  registrar  -- would be able to rapidly
discern  the  extenuating  routing  circumstances and would direct the
client to the proper place.

And  I'd  say  that  Darin's  999/1000  is actually much too low. It's
probably more like 99,999/100,000 times that a person who. . .

a) doesn't have a PTR for their mailserver in April 2005;

b) doesn't know that forward DNS is unrelated to reverse DNS;

c)  exhausts  the  DNS  resources  on the net without finding guidance
there;

d) posts to an IMail list with this FAQ, without noting that they have
already  consulted  their  bandwidth  provider, as the archives (until
now) always recommend; and

e) is the sole IT person charged with solving this problem

.  . . does not own their Class C. This is not meant as a slur on Ken,
who  certainly has skills outside this arena that we do not, but based
on experience.

--Sandy


This email is intended solely for the intended recipient.  If you are not
the intended recipient, then any copying of this email is strictly
prohibited.  If you received this message in error, then you should
immediately notify the sender by telephone or return email and then delete
it from your computer.

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to