I've been happy with both products really (Brightmail/Symantec and
MxGuard/ClamAV), we use Brightmail for our own purposes,  and we use the
ClamAV for our clients, unless they pay for Brightmail licenses for our
server.

Aaron Payne
IT Systems Administrator & Postmaster
E-site Marketing, LLC

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Tech
Support
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 1:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Expiring AV - Mandatory upgrade to ICS

agreed. Probably would have been a better move to include Clam into ICS than
Symantec.

Lee Cox wrote:

>We are using FProt and ClamAV with MXguard. It is a very effective package.
>With the spike in Virus activity last week and this week, we stopped 
>over 2500 viruses from getting to our users. ClamAV and FProt had the 
>definitions out a day before Symantec had the fix release. I wouldn't 
>think of paying for AV from IpSwitch with the available solutions that are
more effective.
>
>Medical Management Professionals
>Lee Cox
>Network Administrator
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Payne
>Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 12:43 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Expiring AV - Mandatory upgrade to ICS
>
>We use a combination of MxGuard and ClamAV on the actual server, and 
>Brightmail Anti-spam on the frontend, which runs Symantec AV which is 
>updated something like every hour.  We got a decent pricing arrangement 
>because we renewed our client AV at the same time.
>
>Before we went with Brightmail, we stopped something like 300-400 
>viruses a day with just the ClamAV package, we didn't have a single 
>virus slip through in 8 months.
> 
>Aaron Payne
>IT Systems Administrator & Postmaster
>E-site Marketing, LLC
>
>________________________________
>
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Norman
>Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 12:05 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [IMail Forum] Expiring AV - Mandatory upgrade to ICS
>
>
>Hello all...
> 
> 
>I wanted to get your thoughts on a situation I am having with IP 
>Switch, along with a recommendation on AV products.
> 
>We currently run IMail 8.05 at a school, and it runs perfectly for what 
>we need.  Our AV is expiring, and IP Switch is telling us that they 
>will no longer supply an AV renewal, and to maintain our AV protection, 
>we will need to go to the ICS (mucho $$$$$).  We feel this is 
>incredibly bogus, as we are satisfied with the product we have now, and 
>all we want to do is upgrade our AV patterns.
> 
>I have spoken with IPSwitch, and they are telling me 'this is the way 
>it is'.  I wanted to hear from others their experiences and thoughts.
> 
>To get around this, we are thinking about integrating a third party AV 
>with our MX Guard SPAM filter.  It integrates with FPROT, CLAM, and 
>NAI.  I wanted to get some opinions and experiences with others who 
>have utilized this method, and what AV they felt was best.
> 
>Thanks for your time,
> 
>TN
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>List Archive: 
>http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
>
>
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>List Archive: 
>http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
>
>
>  
>

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to