Dan,
         What scripts were you referring to that was posted here for BlackICE?  
Are you running BI Server?
 
Keith

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dan Horne 
        Sent: Thu 5/19/2005 9:32 AM 
        To: [email protected] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTPD Memory usage
        
        

        I agree that Ipswitch needs to get cracking on fixing the issue, but if 
        you want it to stop NOW then you can use IMGate/postfix or BlackIce 
        Server with the configs that were posted to the list some time back. 
        Both methods worked great and Imail is now much happier (we eventually 
        stuck with postfix gateway).  I know many people don't want to have to 
        set up a linux/bsd gateway, so BlackIce is an alternative that does 
        work.  I couldn't wait for Ipswitch to figure out the problem (which 
        they still haven't done, I guess). 

        Postfix on FreeBSD can be set up on a low-end box (ours is 300mhz/190MB 
        RAM/10GB HD).  We do not use Len's IMGate config, we prefer to let 
        Declude/Sniffer do all the spam filtering.  It rejects well over 
100,000 
        dictionary attempts per day (we only actually process less than 20,000 
        in Imail, of which close to 80% are flagged as spam).  In comparison, 
        Imail was needing daily reboots before the gateway was put in, and it 
is 
        running on dual 2.4Ghz/1G RAM/separate mirrored spool, system and 
        mailbox drives.  It isn't ideal (again, Ipswitch should fix the 
        problem), but if you can't wait for Ipswitch, then you need to do one 
of 
        the above or dump Imail. 

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Tech 
        Support 
        Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:01 AM 
        To: [email protected] 
        Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] SMTPD Memory usage 

        I'm sure this is contributing to the problem as most of us are under 
        dictionary attacks at some point in the day. My concern is that the 
smtp 
        service isn't releasing the memory. 

        Dan Horne wrote: 

        >Could this be the result of excessive dictionary attacks?  Even with 
        >8.2's new feature to protect from these, if the attacks are 
distributed 

        >across many IP addresses it could still bog down your server.  When it 
        >was happening to us, I didn't check smtpd32's mem usage, but I do know 
        >that our server needed a reboot almost daily because it would slow 
down 

        >until it couldn't process any more mail at all.  Search your logs for 
        >"invalid user" and see how many hits you get.  Just a thought. 
        > 
        >-----Original Message----- 
        >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity 
        >Tech Support 
        >Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 4:55 PM 
        >To: [email protected] 
        >Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] SMTPD Memory usage 
        > 
        >No!  good 
        >Which version are you running? 8.2 HF1 
        >What OS?  Win2K SP4 
        >What kind of hardware? Dell 
        >How long does it run before needing a reboot? not consistent but ram 
        >usage grows above 100 MB's in about 2 hrs 
        > 
        >for 8.2 you should see memory between 6 and 20 mb for smaller installs 
        >but it can grow to 60 - 120 mb for a very very active server where 
many 

        >users are sending very large attachments.  But the mem usage should 
        >drop back down to between 10 and 20 mb during low usage times. 
        > 
        >memory never drops down 
        > 
        >BTW, is there a 'nobody' alias on one of your domains? Or do you have 
a 

        >lot of mail going to one mailbox?  This could cause temporary spikes 
in 

        >mem usage if that account is receiving mail with a lot of attachments. 
        > 
        >only on our domain 
        > 
        >Another issue that I have seen behavior like that in testing 8.2 is 
the 

        >spool drive needing a chkdisk to clean up bad indexes which can be 
        >caused by killing a process while it is creating or deleting a file. 
        >The issue is that if the service cannot create  the spool files the 
        >threads will block trying to do that and you will see memory grow, the 
        >thread count grow beyond your Max setting (default 60) and the server 
        >once all the worker threads are blocked, does not do anything until 
you 

        >kill it.  But killing it does not solve the problem, running chkdsk /r 
        >does in this case.  Defragging is good and should be done often but 
        >does not address this particular issue. 
        > 
        >We're degragging every 4 hours 
        > 
        > 
        >To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
        >List Archive: 
        >http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ 
        >Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ 
        > 
        >To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
        >List Archive: 
        >http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ 
        >Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ 
        > 
        > 
        >  
        > 

        To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
        List Archive: 
        http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ 
        Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ 

        To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
        List Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ 
        Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ 

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to