I was just inquiring about this registry entry that makes SMTPD drop a
connection if someone sends more than X number of emails to an incorrect
address. Perhaps someone here has been mislabeling it as tarpitting,
either way when I get a chance I'm going to RTFM like Tom said and
figure out how to turn it on myself... Then I'll be a nice person and
post it here in the event someone else doesn't have TFM handy.
Sam
Eric Shanbrom wrote:
My understanding of the definition of tarpitting is slowing down the delivery of messages
to multiple recipients...If my understanding is correct see "delay between
recipients" in the SMTP Advanced tab in IMail Admin. If not please enlighten me to
the proper mening
Thnx
Eric S
----- Original Message -----
From: Matrosity Tech Support
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Dictionary Attacks
that's because imail doesn't have tarpitting by definition.
S.J.Stanaitis wrote:
Stupid question, where's this mystery reg-key to enable tarpitting. I did a search for tarpitting in messages from the last 2 months and found zilch.
Thanks,
Sam
Dev wrote:
True, but I still give credit to Ipswitch, despite
their incredibly slow product development pace, of
getting the dictionary attack countermeasure deployed
ahead of what they originally planned. The attacks were
killing a lot of us.
In fact, the lack of tarpitting in v.8 was the final
straw that forced us to migrate to a competing mail
server. Average CPU usage immediately went from 50% to
1%. In fact, I recently did the first reboot (for MS
patches) with the production server--after 96 days of
continuous uneventful uptime. Total system memory usage
remained rock stable (+-30MB) the entire time.
The next release of Imail must be fully-featured and
bullet-proof, otherwise I can't see them surviving
against increasingly superior competition.
Dev
Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 2:29:40 PM, you wrote:
HE> I am sorry but I disagree.
HE> This has been requested for a long time and
HE> this is a common feature in
HE> many programs.
HE> Ipswitch decide in the last minute to add it,
HE> I think that show where
HE> their focus has been.
HE> ICS and not Imail server.
HE> Dev wrote:
In Ipswitch's defense, I went on a rant about this
limited functionality last month, and Tripp replied
with some helpful background here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg98088.html
Dev
Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 9:16:10 AM, you wrote:
HE> I really don't understand why Ipswitch did not
HE> make this function work a
HE> little better.
HE> Just dropping the connection seems to be lazy on their part.
HE> They could have made this function better while at it.
HE> H.
HE> Matrosity Tech Support wrote:
no period of time so they can simply open
another connection and keep
doing so.
Tom Pepper wrote:
IMail 8.20: After the maximum invalid
recipients are reached, the
SMTPD will close the connection.
How long is this IP address denied access to
the server? Is it reset
after a period of time?
Thanks,
Tom
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
--
S.J.Stanaitis
Network Administrator, Decorative Product Source
http://www.dpsource.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(877)-650-8054 x160
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
