> we have a Linux-IP-Tables Firewall. Yes.
> 
> Isn't it possible, that an internal (hidden) process 
> sends/receives data on unpreveliged ports not bound to IMail ?

Not if the firwall before the Imail-box deny in- AND outgoing traffic for
this unpreveliged ports.

But before some other questions:
Any noticeable change regarding Imail logfile size together with the traffic
step?

What does say a command line "netstat -n"
Can you install TCPView from sysinternals.com?

+2,5 GB of traffic should be found somewhere on the disk if it's not tipical
smtp-delivered and pop3-retrieved email traffic. What about disk space
usage?

Can you search for certain error messages in the SMTP-logfile. For example
delivery errors if the remote mailserver has tried to send a message larger
then the allowed max message size. Theoreticaly if another MTA has set his
queue to retry delivery aech 10 minutes and this for let's say 7 days and
you've set a max incomming message size of 20 MB this would create around
2,8 GB of additional incomming SMTP-traffic that wouldn't be visible or
noticeable anywhere else then in your SMTP-logfile and your providers
traffic report.

Has this server installed all updates? Or: Is there any reason to believe
this server is compromised?

Can you set up MRTG to watch your servers traffic. (sidenote: with Darrels
tools you can watch also your Imail-usage like SMTP/POP3-connections,
traffic and so on:  http://www.invariantsystems.com)


Markus


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to