We encourage the use of Terminal Services for our clients that need that
amount of connectivity.  There are some issues that you should be aware
of.

1.      Terminal services only loads free on a machine for Admin
purposes client logons require a terminal server client license.
2.      Not all software will run more than once on a machine.  We
attempted to install Intellisync for wireless synchronization and the
software would only allow one occurrence to be running.
3.      Ensure that you have a powerful machine to handle numerous
clients at the same time.  Dual Processors 1GB Ram Minimum.

Overall it is the best solution that we have found.  You can have
numerous users connected individually with there own unique preference
settings.

Mike Odryna
Owner
Island Pond Computer
http://www.islandpc.com
(603)635-8700
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Barker
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 1:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Remote Control

Do not use GoToMyPc. Simple.

NetOp is WAAAAAY faster/better than PCAnywhere or Remotely Possible or
whatever else.

However, Terminal Services is faster yet, and free. If these are W2K
servers or XP Pro, don't buy anything at all.

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Riddle
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 12:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Remote Control


Sorry for the off topic post but this is a good "networking"
knowledgeable group.

I have a client that currently uses pcAnywhere 11.5 to allow +5 of its
employees to access the internal network with pcAnywhere to a specific
group of older notebook computers, residing in their server room, that
have been setup to specifically to hosts these remote sessions.

They have a new employee who has been given access and he is pushing
them to dump pcAnywhere in favor of GoToMyPC and they have against my
advice put the software on a few of the machines.

I understand the differences in the approach of the two applications
(stand alone v. browser based and separate installation v. accessing via
third party server).  I have two major concerns with GoToMyPC and they
are of course the monthly subscription cost of GoToMyPC compared to the
one time ownership costs of pcAnywhere (this makes the cost of
pcAnywhere actually
cheaper) but the biggest concern is that with pcAnywhere we can
configure the router to allow specific access to specific machines
through the firewall since pcAnywhere runs on configurable specific
ports.  In the past this has been beneficial when an employee was to be
terminated and we could either change the assigned ports on the hosts
and reconfigure the router or change the password. GoToMyPC readily
breaches the network firewall.  This is well and fine for the single
user with his "host" computer sitting on a cable modem at home that has
a dynamic IP but when you have.  I love the "doublespeak" that GoToMyPC
has on their website about this.  They say they work with most firewalls
but that pcAnywhere compromises the firewall by bypassing (an outright
lie) it when in reality GoToMyPC is really the application operating
outside of network security.

Am I all wet on my concerns or are there other concerns that I have not
thought about.


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to