I concur with the guy in the office next to me :-)
It's now some 20 years since the start of all this and I seem to recall
in past posts that carrying the baggage of the past makes it difficult
at times to move forward. If moving forward requires us to finally
discard other formats and ideas that seemed necessary 20 years ago but
no longer make as much sense today then I'm all for it. Unless, of
course, you get rid of something I want ;-) Just kidding.
David
Andrew Laurence wrote:
At 8:55 AM -0700 10/29/08, Mark Crispin wrote:
I have given serious consideration to deleting support for some of the
old formats in Panda IMAP, and perhaps even requiring that mix be
the one and only format. That would, in effect, make Panda IMAP
behave just like Dovecot in that regard. People could always use UW
IMAP (at least until it software rots) if they want to use one of the
old crufty formats.
If that would aid/speed implementation of some long-desired extensions
(e.g. 4314 and 2087), I think that would be a very fine idea.
--
David Severance
Network and Academic Computing Services
(949) 824-7552
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Imap-uw mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
