At 10:55 AM -0700 10/29/08, Mark Crispin wrote:
> If that would aid/speed implementation of some long-desired
extensions (e.g. 4314 and 2087), I think that would be a very fine
idea.
I don't want to mislead anyone.
There is no funding for that level of effort in Panda IMAP, nor is there
likely to be in the foreseeable future. As far as I know, UW IMAP is
moribund; there have been a couple of bugfixes since my departure
(Panda has these and more) but development has ended.
I've long been surprised that UW hasn't substantially forked to date.
I also recall your comments over the years at the difficulty of
maintaining compatibility with all the mailbox formats. One ponders
if omitting supported formats would make it easier for other coders
to fork and carry it forward.
I am writing a new IMAP server for Messaging Architects (no big
surprise...). The lion's share of my current (and future) work is
going there.
Will that be open sources as well? ;-)
--
Andrew Laurence
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Imap-uw mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
