On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:34:35PM -0500, Dan White wrote: > loss of tcp connection != loss of state. > loss of the state we are talking about here. it's all based on mark's postulation that a tcp connection is reliable.
> In my own review of several IMAP RFCs, it's clear that connection problems > have been anticipated and several options have been standardized, > i suggest you verify the chronology of events. and compare the names on particular rfcs. _______________________________________________ Imap-uw mailing list [email protected] http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
