On May 6 2010, Mark Crispin wrote:
I go to the trouble to teach you how things actually work, and you respond with a typical nihilistic Gen-X retort.
Was that what you said, or was it not? It quite clearly was, so the retort was typically nothing (particularly indicative of a generation to which I do not belong).
The righteous thing is to follow the specifications; and if you think that the specifications are incorrect then work to get them changed. You're the one who seems to be angrily insisting that the specifications shouldn't be followed.
Oh? I'd be quite curious for you to teach me where it was that I said such.
And then to make stupid statements such as "TCP is not reliable".
Or stupid statements such as, "You're talking about failures at the application layer, but you shouldn't try to address it in the application"?
Pshaw. So you want to bring up Linux's "half-duplex" close behavior, eh?
You may project anything you wish...
That's irrelevant to RST in IMAP sessions.
... so that you may be comfortable in refuting it.
-Brian _______________________________________________ Imap-uw mailing list [email protected] http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
