>> After some off-list discussion, I think we WILL create a new list, >> <[email protected]>. If anyone *objects* to this, please post here >> and say why. Otherwise, the next version of the charter proposal will >> say that. > > I'm not highly against it, but I think we already have too many > imap-related mailing lists. Gets difficult to know sometimes where to > post a question and if all the important people are reading the right > lists.
ACK. That was my thinking in wanting to do this here (on imap5). But because this list was chartered for a different purpose, there's (reasonable) concern that there will be distractions in both directions if we temporarily hijack it for this one. I will probably propose to the IESG that we accept this as an exception, and use the <[email protected]> list that's already there. That fits better in its purpose, but puts a new WG mailing list off of IETF premises. The IESG has stopped short of saying that should never happen, but has a strong preference against it. So I want everyone to be prepared in case we choose to create a new list. Barry _______________________________________________ imap5 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5
